ThisCalculator

Everyday

Why Pro Gamers Use LCD Monitors & OLED’s Impact

Updated · Standard formula, shown below

Pro gamers use LCD monitors because they offer the best combination of low input lag, high refresh rates, and consistent performance at a price that tournament organizers and players can justify. OLED is changing that by delivering superior response times and contrast, but its adoption in competitive play is slowed by cost, burn-in risk, and the fact that LCDs have already hit the performance levels that matter most in esports.

The Competitive Gaming Monitor Landscape

In professional esports, every millisecond counts. The monitor is the final link between the game’s rendering and your eyes, and it must keep up with the fastest player inputs. For years, the standard has been a Twisted Nematic (TN) or In-Plane Switching (IPS) LCD panel running at 240 Hz or 360 Hz. These panels are chosen not because they have the best image quality, but because they have the lowest input lag and the highest refresh rates available.

OLED (Organic Light-Emitting Diode) panels are the new challenger. They offer near-instant pixel response times (often under 1 ms), perfect blacks, and no backlight bleed. But they also cost significantly more, and they carry a risk of permanent burn-in when displaying static elements like a game’s HUD or a scoreboard for hours on end. That risk alone has kept many tournament organizers and professional teams from switching.

What Makes a Monitor ‘Pro-Grade’?

Professional players and tournament organizers look for specific specifications that directly affect gameplay. The most critical are:

  • Refresh rate: How many times per second the monitor updates the image. 144 Hz is the minimum for serious play, but 240 Hz and 360 Hz are now common in tournaments.
  • Response time: How quickly a pixel changes color. A slow response time causes ghosting (blurred trails behind moving objects). Lower is better.
  • Input lag: The delay between when your computer sends a frame and when it appears on screen. This is separate from response time and is often not advertised.
  • Adaptive sync: Technologies like G-Sync or FreeSync that match the monitor’s refresh rate to the GPU’s frame rate, reducing screen tearing. However, many pros disable this to get the absolute lowest latency.

LCD panels, especially TN and fast IPS variants, have been refined to the point where they can hit 360 Hz with response times around 1 ms. That combination is what has made them the default choice in esports.

Why LCD Still Dominates in Esports

There are several concrete reasons LCD remains the standard in professional play:

  1. Cost-effectiveness: A 360 Hz IPS LCD monitor can be had for a fraction of the price of a comparable OLED. Tournament organizers need dozens of monitors, and teams often buy their own for practice. The price difference is a major factor.
  2. Burn-in resistance: Static images (health bars, minimaps, timers) are present in nearly every esport. OLED burn-in is a real, documented issue, and no pro wants their monitor permanently scarred after a few months of practice.
  3. Maturity of technology: LCD has been the standard for over a decade. Its quirks are well understood, and there are decades of manufacturing refinements that have brought down defects and improved consistency.
  4. Refresh rate ceiling: While OLED can theoretically hit 480 Hz, LCD panels already reach 360 Hz, which is beyond what most human eyes can perceive as a difference. The marginal gain from 360 to 480 Hz is tiny compared to the cost increase.

How OLED Changes the Game

OLED monitors are not just a minor upgrade; they are a fundamentally different display technology. Each pixel emits its own light, so there is no backlight. This leads to:

  • Instant response: OLED pixels can switch on and off in microseconds, effectively eliminating ghosting. This is a real advantage in fast-paced games where tracking a moving target is crucial.
  • Perfect contrast: Since pixels can turn off completely, blacks are truly black. This makes it easier to spot enemies in dark corners or shadows.
  • Wide color gamut: OLEDs typically cover a larger percentage of the DCI-P3 color space, which makes games look more vibrant, though this is less relevant for competitive play.
  • High refresh rates: The latest OLED panels can reach 240 Hz and even 480 Hz, matching or exceeding the fastest LCDs.

However, these benefits come with trade-offs. The most significant is burn-in. Even with modern mitigation techniques like pixel shifting and screen savers, the risk remains. For a professional who plays the same game for 8 hours a day, the HUD elements could become permanently etched into the panel.

Comparing LCD and OLED for Pro Use

To see why the transition is slow, here’s a direct comparison based on the factors that matter in esports:

  • Response time: OLED wins (0.1 ms vs 1 ms). This is the biggest technical advantage.
  • Input lag: Both can be extremely low (under 2 ms), but LCDs have had more time to be optimized. In practice, the difference is negligible.
  • Refresh rate: LCD currently offers 360 Hz mainstream; OLED is catching up with 240 Hz and 480 Hz models. It’s a tie at the top.
  • Burn-in risk: LCD wins (virtually none). OLED is a real concern.
  • Price: LCD wins (much cheaper for the same size and refresh rate).
  • Viewing angles: OLED wins (no color shift at angles), but pros sit directly in front, so this is less important.

In a tournament setting, the burn-in risk is the dealbreaker. A monitor that fails mid-match is a disaster. Until OLED burn-in is completely solved, or the price drops dramatically, LCD will remain the safe choice.

Common Misconceptions About Pro Monitors

There are a few myths that persist about what pros actually use:

  • “Pros use the most expensive monitor.” Not necessarily. They use the monitor that gives them the best competitive edge for the price. A $300 240 Hz TN panel can be better for gaming than a $1,000 4K IPS panel because it has lower latency.
  • “Higher resolution is better.” In esports, resolution is secondary. Most pros play at 1080p or 1440p because it’s easier to reach high frame rates. 4K is rarely used in tournaments because it taxes the GPU, lowering FPS.
  • “OLED is the future, so it’s already here.” OLED is the future, but it’s not the present in competitive gaming. The technology is still maturing, and the risks are too high for most pros.

Frequently Asked Questions

Do pro gamers use OLED monitors?

As of now, very few professional esports players use OLED monitors in official tournaments. The main reasons are the high cost, the risk of burn-in from static HUDs, and the fact that LCD monitors already offer 360 Hz refresh rates and low input lag, which is sufficient for top-level play.

Is OLED better for gaming than LCD?

For image quality and response time, yes. OLED has near-instant pixel response and perfect contrast, which can make games look better and feel more responsive. However, for competitive gaming specifically, the difference in input lag is minimal, and the burn-in risk makes OLED a less reliable choice for long practice sessions.

Why do pros use 1080p instead of 4K?

Pros prioritize frame rate over resolution. A 1080p monitor allows the GPU to render frames faster, which leads to higher FPS and lower input lag. In fast-paced games, a higher frame rate is more beneficial than a sharper image. Also, most esports titles are designed to run well on lower resolutions.

Will OLED replace LCD in esports?

Eventually, yes, but not immediately. OLED technology is improving, and burn-in mitigation is getting better. Once the price drops and the burn-in risk is minimized, OLED will likely become the standard. For now, LCD remains the safer and more cost-effective choice for tournaments and practice.

What refresh rate do pro gamers use?

Most professional players use 240 Hz or 360 Hz monitors. These high refresh rates provide a smoother image and reduce motion blur, which helps with tracking moving targets. 144 Hz is considered the minimum for serious play, but 240 Hz and above are now the norm in top-level competitions.

Related

Method: the standard formula for this calculation, rounded as each result states. See how the calculators work or report an error.