ThisCalculator

Math

Solve Square Roots Without a Calculator

Updated · Standard formula, shown below

Square root 7.0711
Number
50
You entered

Solve Square Roots Without a Calculator

This guide shows you how to find square roots by hand using two reliable methods: the prime factorization approach for perfect squares and the long division (or digit-by-digit) method for any number. You’ll get a decimal approximation accurate to several places, which is perfect for homework, mental math, or when a calculator isn’t allowed.

Formula

The square root of a number n is a value r such that r × r = n. In symbols: r = √n. The long division method uses the algebraic identity (a + b)² = a² + 2ab + b² to find each digit of the root one at a time.

Variables:

  • n – the number you want the square root of (must be non-negative for real results).
  • r – the square root, the result.

Worked Example

Let’s find √50 using the long division method (the default value in the calculator above).

  1. Pair the digits: Starting from the decimal point, group digits in pairs. For 50, write as 50.00 00 00.
  2. Find the largest digit whose square ≤ 50: 7² = 49, 8² = 64 (too big). Write 7 above the 50. Subtract 49 from 50, leaving 1.
  3. Bring down the next pair (00): Now the current number is 100.
  4. Double the root so far (7 × 2 = 14): Write 14 as a divisor prefix. Find a digit x such that (140 + x) × x ≤ 100. Try x=0: 140 × 0 = 0. So write 0 above the next pair.
  5. Subtract and bring down next pair: 100 – 0 = 100. Bring down 00 -> 10000.
  6. Double the root (70 × 2 = 140): Find x such that (1400 + x) × x ≤ 10000. Try x=7: 1407 × 7 = 9849. x=8: 1408 × 8 = 11264 (too big). So write 7.
  7. Continue: 10000 – 9849 = 151. Bring down 00 -> 15100. Double root (707 × 2 = 1414). Find x: 14140 + x times x ≤ 15100. Try x=1: 14141 × 1 = 14141. Write 1.
  8. Result so far: 7.071… The calculator gives 7.0711, which matches. √50 ≈ 7.0711.

When to Use This

Use the prime factorization method when the number is a perfect square (like 144, 225, 1024) – it’s faster and exact. Use the long division method when you need a decimal approximation for any positive number, especially non-perfect squares. It’s also handy when you want to check a calculator’s result or understand the concept deeply.

To read the result: if you get 7.0711, that means 7.0711 × 7.0711 ≈ 50. The more digits you compute, the closer the square of your answer gets to the original number.

Common Mistakes

  • Forgetting to pair digits from the decimal point: For 1234, pairs are 12 | 34, not 1 | 23 | 4. For 0.5, pairs are 0. | 50 | 00.
  • Using the wrong divisor when doubling: You double the entire root found so far, not just the last digit. For root 7, double is 14, not 7×2? Actually yes, 14 is correct.
  • Choosing a digit that makes the product too large: Always check that (divisor × digit) ≤ current number. If not, reduce the digit.
  • Rounding too early: If you need 3 decimal places, compute at least 4 or 5 digits to avoid rounding errors.
  • Applying prime factorization to non-perfect squares: 50 = 2 × 5², so √50 = 5√2, but that’s not a decimal. For a decimal, use long division.

Tips

  • Memorize common perfect squares: Knowing 1² through 20² helps you quickly estimate and check your work.
  • For prime factorization: Divide the number by the smallest prime repeatedly. Pair identical factors – each pair comes out of the root as one copy.
  • Use estimation first: For √50, note 7²=49 and 8²=64, so the root is between 7 and 8. This tells you the integer part.
  • Keep your work neat: Use graph paper or align columns – long division is error-prone when messy.
  • Check by squaring: Multiply your answer by itself. It should be close to the original number (within your rounding).

Troubleshooting

My answer seems too small or too large. Re-check your first digit – it must be the largest integer whose square is ≤ the first pair. Also verify you brought down pairs correctly.

I keep getting a remainder that never goes to zero. That’s normal for non-perfect squares. Just keep bringing down pairs of zeros and continue until you have enough decimal places.

I can’t find the right digit in the long division step. Estimate by dividing the current number by the doubled root (ignoring the trailing zero). For example, if current number is 15100 and doubled root is 1414, try 15100 ÷ 1414 ≈ 10.7, but since we need a digit 0-9, try 9 or 8 and adjust.

My calculator says a different answer. Make sure you didn’t round intermediate steps. Keep all digits in the divisor and current number as you go.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I use this method for negative numbers? No, the square root of a negative number is not real. You would need imaginary numbers (i), which are beyond this guide.

How many decimal places can I get? As many as you want – just keep bringing down pairs of zeros. Each pair gives one more decimal digit.

Is there a faster way for perfect squares? Yes, use prime factorization. For example, √144 = √(2� × 3²) = 2² × 3 = 12.

What is the difference between this method and Newton’s method? Newton’s method (guess, average, repeat) converges faster but requires a good initial guess. The long division method is exact and systematic.

Can I use this for cube roots? The long division method works for cube roots too, but the formula changes (using (a+b)³). It’s more complex, so most people use logarithms or calculators for cube roots.

Why do we pair digits from the decimal point? Because each pair of digits in the number corresponds to one digit in the square root. For example, √(12.25) has two digits before the decimal in the root (3.5), matching the two pairs (12 and 25).

Related

Formula used
in n | Number | - | 50 | 0
out root | Square root | - | sqrt(n) | 4

Each line is one input (in, sel, list) or one result (out: label, unit, formula, decimals). How the calculators work

Method: the standard formula for this calculation, rounded as each result states. See how the calculators work or report an error.