Coefficient of Determination Calculator (R²)
The calculator for this page is switched off while it is checked. The formula is below, and the worked example in the article shows how to use it by hand.
This calculator works out the coefficient of determination (R²) from two paired lists of values: your observed (actual) data and the values predicted by a model. You paste or type the two lists, and the calculator returns R² as a number between 0 and 1, which tells you how much of the variance in the observed data the model explains.
Formula
The coefficient of determination is defined as:
R² = 1 – (SSres / SStot)
- SSres (residual sum of squares) = Σ(yi – ŷi)², where yi is each observed value and ŷi is the corresponding predicted value.
- SStot (total sum of squares) = Σ(yi – ȳ)², where ȳ is the mean of the observed values.
Both sums are in squared units of the dependent variable. The ratio SSres/SStot is the fraction of variance left unexplained, so subtracting it from 1 gives the fraction explained.
Worked Example
Using the default lists: observed = [4, 5, 6, 7, 8], predicted = [3.8, 5.1, 5.9, 7.2, 7.9].
- Mean of observed: (4+5+6+7+8)/5 = 6.0
- Total sum of squares: (4–6)² + (5–6)² + (6–6)² + (7–6)² + (8–6)² = 4 + 1 + 0 + 1 + 4 = 10
- Residuals: (4–3.8)=0.2, (5–5.1)=–0.1, (6–5.9)=0.1, (7–7.2)=–0.2, (8–7.9)=0.1
- Residual sum of squares: 0.04 + 0.01 + 0.01 + 0.04 + 0.01 = 0.11
- R² = 1 – (0.11 / 10) = 1 – 0.011 = 0.989
The calculator shows R² ≈ 0.989, meaning the predicted values explain about 98.9% of the variance in the observed data.
When to Use R²
Use R² when you have a model (regression line, machine learning prediction, physical law fit) and you want a single number describing how well it tracks the actual outcomes. Common applications include:
- Evaluating a linear regression fit in statistics coursework.
- Comparing two forecasting models to see which explains more variance.
- Checking the fit of a theoretical curve to experimental measurements.
R² is scale‑free, so it works whether your data is in meters, dollars, or degrees Celsius. It does not, however, tell you whether the model is appropriate – only how well it fits the given points.
How to Read the Result
R² ranges from 0 to 1 in most practical cases (it can be negative if the model is worse than simply using the mean).
- R² = 1: perfect fit – all predicted values equal observed values.
- R² = 0.8–0.99: strong explanatory power, common for well‑fitting regressions.
- R² = 0.5: the model explains half the variance; the other half is noise or missing variables.
- R² = 0: the model is no better than predicting the mean every time.
- R² < 0: the model fits worse than the mean – a sign of a badly specified model or wrong predictions.
A high R² does not prove causation. It also does not indicate whether the coefficients are statistically significant – that requires additional tests like p‑values.
Common Mistakes and Limitations
- Mismatched list lengths: the calculator will fail or give nonsense if the observed and predicted lists have different numbers of entries. Always check that each observed value has exactly one prediction.
- Ignoring outliers: a single large residual (e.g., a data entry error) can dramatically lower R². Plot the residuals to spot them.
- Using R² for non‑linear models blindly: R² is still computable, but it may not be comparable across different model forms. For non‑linear fits, consider adjusted R² or AIC.
- Confusing R² with correlation r: R² is the square of the Pearson correlation coefficient for a simple linear regression. For a linear model, r = √R², but the sign of r is lost – R² is always non‑negative.
- Overfitting: adding more predictors always increases R², even if they are irrelevant. Use adjusted R² when comparing models with different numbers of terms.
R² vs. Adjusted R²
Adjusted R² modifies the standard R² to penalize adding extra predictors. The formula is:
Adjusted R² = 1 – (1 – R²) × (n – 1) / (n – k – 1)
where n is the number of observations and k is the number of predictors. When you add a useless variable, R² goes up slightly, but adjusted R² may go down. Use adjusted R² when comparing models with different numbers of predictors, especially in multiple regression.
Frequently Asked Questions
What does R² = 0.75 mean in plain words?
It means that 75% of the variation in your observed values is explained by the model. The remaining 25% is due to other factors, measurement error, or randomness. It does not mean the predictions are 75% accurate – accuracy is measured by error metrics like RMSE.
Can R² be negative?
Yes. This happens when the model’s predictions are worse than simply using the mean of the observed data. For example, if you fit a line to data that is strongly curved, the residuals can be so large that SSres exceeds SStot, making R² negative. Many software packages report negative R² as 0, but the true value is negative.
What is the difference between R² and correlation coefficient r?
The correlation coefficient r measures the strength and direction of a linear relationship between two variables, ranging from –1 to +1. R² is the square of r (for simple linear regression) and represents the proportion of shared variance. R² is always between 0 and 1, and it loses the direction information – you can’t tell if the relationship is positive or negative from R² alone.
How do I calculate R² for a non‑linear model?
The same formula works: R² = 1 – (SSres / SStot). You just need the observed values and the model’s predictions. However, R² for non‑linear models is not directly comparable to R² from linear models, and it can be misleading. For non‑linear fits, consider using the standard error of the estimate or information criteria like AIC.
Why does my calculator show a different R² than Excel?
Excel’s RSQ function and most statistical software compute R² the same way, but rounding differences or using the wrong list order can cause small discrepancies. Also, Excel’s chart trendline R² for a linear fit is identical to the manual formula, but for polynomial fits it uses a different calculation. Double‑check that you have not swapped observed and predicted values – R² is symmetric for linear regression, but not for non‑linear models.
Related
Formula used
list obs | Observed values | 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 list pred | Predicted values | 3.8, 5.1, 5.9, 7.2, 7.9 out r2 | Coefficient of determination (R²) | - | 1 - (sum((obs - pred)^2) / sum((obs - mean(obs))^2)) | 4 out r | Correlation coefficient (r) | - | sqrt(max(0, r2)) | 4
Each line is one input (in, sel, list) or one result (out: label, unit, formula, decimals). How the calculators work
Method: the standard formula for this calculation, rounded as each result states. See how the calculators work or report an error.