Under-Display Cameras: Are They Good Enough?
Under-display cameras are good enough for casual video calls and quick selfies, but they generally do not match the clarity of a conventional front camera. They make an uninterrupted screen possible by placing the camera beneath the display, trading some image quality—especially in dim light—for a cleaner-looking phone.
How an under-display camera works
A conventional selfie camera looks through an opening in the screen. An under-display camera sits behind a section of display designed to let light reach its lens and sensor. The pixels above that area must still show an image, so the screen has to balance two competing jobs: displaying content and transmitting light.
Manufacturers can adjust the display structure in the camera zone, including the arrangement or density of pixels, to improve light transmission. The camera then captures an image through this layer. Image-processing software may try to correct softness, color shifts, haze, or other artifacts, but it cannot recover all the detail lost when less light reaches the sensor.
This is why the screen area above the lens may look slightly different from the surrounding panel in some conditions, and why camera results vary by phone, display design, software, and lighting. “Under-display” describes the camera’s placement, not a guarantee of a particular image quality.
What to expect on video calls
For a routine call in a bright room, an under-display camera can be perfectly usable. Faces are recognizable, and the video is usually adequate for conversations where convenience matters more than fine detail. The limitations tend to become more apparent when the image is enlarged, viewed on a large screen, or captured against a challenging background.
Common trade-offs include softer facial detail, less accurate skin tones, subdued contrast, and a hazy or washed-out look. Backlighting can make faces appear dark, while low indoor light may produce more visible noise or smearing as the camera and processing try to brighten the image. Motion can also look less clear than in strong, even light.
Call quality is not determined by the camera alone. The other person’s screen, the video-call service, network conditions, compression, and the phone’s microphone all affect the experience. A poor connection can make even a conventional front camera look bad; a strong connection cannot restore detail that the camera never captured.
Selfies: casual shots versus demanding scenes
For a quick selfie to share in a chat, an under-display camera may be sufficient, particularly outdoors or near a bright window. It is less suitable if you want crisp detail for cropping, flattering portrait results, or a dependable image in changing light. A camera hidden beneath the screen can also make it harder to judge framing and focus from the preview.
Be especially cautious about assuming that a phone with a high-resolution selfie camera will produce sharper results simply because of its megapixel figure. The display layer, lens, sensor size, exposure, focus, and image processing all matter. A camera’s nominal resolution does not cancel out light loss or optical limitations.
For important photos—such as a profile picture you plan to enlarge—it may be better to use the rear camera with a timer, a mirror or preview screen if available, or another camera. Rear cameras typically have more space for larger sensors and lenses, although the exact results depend on the device.
How it compares with a conventional front camera
A visible camera cutout or notch is a practical compromise: it interrupts part of the display, but the lens has a clearer path to incoming light. In general, that gives conventional front cameras an advantage in detail and difficult lighting. The size of the gap varies by device, and not every conventional camera is good, but the optical path is less obstructed.
An under-display design prioritizes the screen experience. It can be appealing for watching video, gaming, or simply having a panel without a visible camera opening. The question is whether that uninterrupted display is worth accepting a less capable front camera.
- Choose for camera quality: Prefer a phone with a conventional front camera if you take frequent selfies, make professional-looking calls, or often shoot indoors.
- Choose for an uninterrupted screen: An under-display camera may suit you if front-camera use is occasional and a seamless display matters more.
- Check actual examples: Look for unedited sample photos and video in both bright and dim settings. A manufacturer’s description alone cannot show how the camera performs in your usual conditions.
Ways to get better results
Good technique can reduce, but not eliminate, the camera’s limitations. Before a call or selfie, clean the display over the camera area with a soft, clean cloth; smudges there can further soften or scatter light. Then try these steps:
- Face a window or another soft light source, and avoid placing a bright window directly behind you.
- Keep the phone steady and position the camera near eye level. This helps framing and reduces distracting movement.
- Use the phone’s preview to check focus and exposure before taking a selfie; move to a brighter spot if the image looks noisy or dull.
- For a call, use even lighting on your face rather than relying on a bright screen or a single harsh lamp.
- If detail matters, switch to a rear camera or a separate camera when the call app allows it.
These steps help because more and better-directed light gives the camera more useful information. They do not turn an under-display camera into a conventional one, and aggressive filters or sharpening can make artifacts more obvious rather than restore genuine detail.
Who should consider one?
An under-display camera is best treated as a design feature with a camera compromise, not as an upgrade for selfies. It can make sense for someone who rarely uses the front camera and values a screen without a visible cutout. It is a weaker fit for people who use video calls all day, record front-facing clips, or expect polished selfies in varied lighting.
Before buying, consider how often you use the front camera and whether you can inspect sample footage from the exact phone. Pay attention to a normal indoor room, a dim scene, and a bright background—not just a carefully lit promotional image. If image quality is a priority, compare a conventional-camera alternative at a similar price and look at real results rather than relying on specifications alone.
Frequently Asked Questions
Are under-display cameras blurry?
They can look softer than conventional front cameras, but the degree varies. Bright, even light usually produces more usable results than a dim room or a strongly backlit scene.
Are under-display cameras good for Zoom or other video calls?
They are generally adequate for casual calls when you have good lighting. If you need consistently clear, detailed video, a conventional front camera or separate camera is usually the safer choice.
Can people see the camera beneath the screen?
There is no visible camera hole, but the display area above the camera may look different from the rest of the screen in some situations. Whether that is noticeable depends on the phone and what is displayed.
Does a higher megapixel count make an under-display camera better?
Not by itself. Light transmission, lens quality, sensor performance, focus, and processing also affect image quality; a larger pixel count cannot compensate for every limitation.
How can I improve an under-display camera selfie?
Clean the screen over the lens, face soft light, avoid a bright background behind you, and hold the phone steady. For a critical photo, consider using the rear camera instead.
Related
Method: the standard formula for this calculation, rounded as each result states. See how the calculators work or report an error.